Document Type : Original Article


  1. منابع و مآخذ

    1. Austin, J. L.; Sense and Sensibilia; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 1962.
    2. Brewer, B.; “Perception and Content”, European Journal of Philosophy; 14(2), 2006, pp.165-181.
    3. Brewer, B.; Perception and its Objects; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2011.
    4. Burge, T.; “Disjunctivism and Perceptual Psychology”, Philosophical Topics; 33(1), 2005, pp.1-78.
    5. Burge, T.; “Disjunctivism Again”, Philosophical Explorations; 14(1), 2011, pp.43–80.
    6. Byrne, A. and H. Logue; “Either/Or”, in Haddock, A. and F. Macpherson (eds.); Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp.57-94.
    7. Crane, T. and C., French; “The Problem of Perception”, The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy; (Winter 2016 Edition), Edward N. Zalta (ed.), 2016, forthcoming URL = <https://plato.stanford.edu/archives/win2016/entries/perception-problem/>.
    8. Ffytche, D. H.; “Hallucinations and the Cheating Brain”, World Science Festival; 2012.
    9. Ffytche, D. H.; “The Hallucinating Brain: Neurological Insights into the Nature of Hallucinations”, in Macpherson, F. and D. Platchias (eds.); Hallucination: Philosophy and Psychology; Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2013, pp.45-63.
    10. Fish, W.; Perception, Hallucination, and Illusion; New York: Oxford University Press, 2009.
    11. Fish, W.; Philosophy of Perception: A Contemporary Introduction; Routledge: Taylor & Francis, 2010.
    12. French, C. and Walters, L.; “The Invalidity of the Argument from Illusion”, American Philosophical Quarterly, 2016.
    13. Hinton, J. M.; Experiences: An Inquiry into Some Ambiguities; Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1973.
    14. Hinton, J. M.; “Visual Experiences”, in Byrne, A. and H. Logue (eds.); Disjunctivism: Contemporary Readings; Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2009, pp.1-11, Originally published in Mind, 76(302), 1967, pp.217-227.
    15. Johnston, M.; “The Obscure Object of Hallucination”, in Byrne, A. and H. Logue (eds.); Disjunctivism: Contemporary Readings; Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2009, pp.207-269, Originally published in Philosophical Studies, 120, 2004, pp.113-183.
    16. Macpherson, F.; “The Philosophy and Psychology of Hallucination: An Introduction”, in Macpherson, F. and D. Platchias (eds.); Hallucination: Philosophy and Psychology; Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2013, pp.1-38.
    17. Martin, M. G. F.; “The Transparency of Experience”, Mind & Language; 17(4), 2002, pp.376-425.
    18. Martin, M. G. F.; “On Being Alienated”, in Gendler, T. and J. Hawthorne (eds.), Perceptual Experience; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2006, pp.354-410.
    19. Martin, M. G. F.; “The Reality of Appearances”, in Byrne, A. and H. Logue (eds.), Disjunctivism: Contemporary Readings; Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2009a, pp.91-115.
    20. Martin, M. G. F.; “The Limits of Self-Awareness”, in Byrne, A. and H. Logue (eds.); Disjunctivism: Contemporary Readings; Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2009b, pp.271-317, Originally published in Philosophical Studies, 120, 2004, pp.37-89.
    21. McDowell, J.; “Criteria, Defeasibility and Knowledge”, Proceeding of the British Academy; 68, 1982, pp.455-479.
    22. McDowell, J.; “The Disjunctive Conception of Experience as Material for a Transcendental Argument”, in Haddock, A. and F. Macpherson (eds.); Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp.376-389.
    23. McDowell, J.; “Perceptual Experience and Empirical Rationality”, Analytic Philosophy; 59(1), 2018, pp.89-98.
    24. Nudds, M.; “Recent Work in Perception: Naïve Realism and its Opponents”, Analysis; 69, 2009, pp.334-346.
    25. Nudds, M.; “Naïve Realism and Hallucinations”, in Macpherson, F. and D. Platchias (eds.); Hallucination: Philosophy and Psychology; Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2013, pp.271-290.
    26. Robinson, H.; Perception; London: Routledge, 1994.
    27. Searle, J.; Seeing Things as They Are: A Theory of Perception; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2015.
    28. Siegel, S.; “Indiscriminability and the Phenomenal”, Philosophical Studies; 120, 2004, pp.91–112.
    29. Siegel, S.; “The Epistemic Conception of Hallucination”, in Haddock, A. and F. Macpherson (eds.); Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp.205-224.
    30. Snowdon, P.; “Some Reflections on an Argument from Hallucination”, Philosophical Topics; 33(1), 2005, pp.285-305.
    31. Snowdon, P.; “Hinton and the Origins of Disjunctivism”, in Haddock, A. and F. Macpherson (eds.); Disjunctivism: Perception, Action, Knowledge; Oxford: Oxford University Press, 2008, pp.35-56.
    32. Snowdon, P.; “Perception, Vision and Causation”, in Byrne, A. and H. Logue (eds.); Disjunctivism: Contemporary Readings; Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2009a, pp.33-48, Originally published in Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society, 81, 1981, pp.175-192.
    33. Snowdon, P.; “The Objects of Perceptual Experiences”, in Byrne, A. and H. Logue (eds.); Disjunctivism: Contemporary Readings; Cambridge, MA: The MIT Press, 2009b, pp.49-74, Originally published in Proceeding of the Aristotelian Society, 105(1), 1990, pp.129-150.
    34. Thau, M.; “What is Disjunctivism?”, Philosophical Studies; 120(1-3), 2004, pp.193-253.