The application of conceptual metaphor theory and conceptual blending in linguistic analysis of Surah Hadid

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Department of English and Linguistics, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad University, Zanjan, Iran
2 Department of English and Linguistics, Zanjan Branch, Islamic Azad Universty, Zanjan, Iran
3 Assistant professor, of Linguistics, Allameh Tabataba'i University, Tehran, Iran
Abstract
This research, conducted using an analytical-descriptive approach, aimed to address the following questions: Is the conceptual metaphor theory effective in explaining the conceptual structure of the "Surah Mosabbahat" in the Holy Quran? And is the theory of conceptual blending networks effective in explaining the conceptual structure of the "Surah Mosabbahat" in the Holy Quran? In this article, an attempt was made to analyze and examine the selected first six verses of Surah Hadid, which is one of the five Mosabbahat Surahs in the Holy Quran, all of which are related to a theological subject, as cognitive components in the process of conceptualizing the Quranic verses. The results of this research demonstrated that from a cognitive semantics perspective, the application of conceptual metaphor theory and conceptual blending network theory using Fauconnier and Turner's four-dimensional network pattern could be effective in explaining the conceptual structure of Quranic components and revealing hidden meanings within the structure of Quranic verses. This could influence the perspective and worldview of the audience, providing a comprehensive understanding of the verses at the human level, facilitating their comprehension. The results of this research could be beneficial in literary analysis, Quranic studies, and the field of cognitive linguistics.
Keywords

Subjects


  1.  

    1. Croft, W, & Cruse, D. A. (2004). Cognitive linguistics, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    2. G. (1994). Mental space: Aspects of meaning construction in natural language, Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
    3. G. (1997). Mappings in thought and language. Cambridge and New York, New York: Cambridge University Press.
    4. G. and Turner, M. (1998). Conceptual integration networks, Cognitive Science, 22(2), 133-187.
    5. G. and Turner, M. (2002). The way we think: Conceptual blending and the mind’s hidden complexities, New York: Basic Books.
    6. T. (1964). God and Man in the Quran: Islamic Book Trust, 2002.
    7. Z. (2002). Metaphor, A practical introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    8. Lakoff, G. and Johnson, M. (1980). Metaphors we live by, Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
    9. Langacker, R. W. (2008). Cognitive grammar, A basic introduction. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
    10. Sweetser, E. (1990). From etymology to pragmatics, Cambridge/ New York: Cambridge University Press.
    11. Talmy, L. (2000). Toward a cognitive semantics, Cambridge, MA: MIT press.