Fallibilism as the basis of Peirce's philosophy

Document Type : Original Article

Authors
1 Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Sciences, Science and Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
2 Department of Philosophy, Faculty of Law, Theology and Political Sciences, Science and, Research Branch, Islamic Azad University, Tehran, Iran
3 The Department of Theoretical Studies of Science, Technology and Innovation, Scientific Policy Research Center
Abstract
In this article, Peirce's fallibilism as the main doctrine in his evolutionary philosophical system is introduced. It will be argued that he introduced a world with the great law of cosmic evolution which is based on Tychism, Synechism and Agapism that never reaches perfect regularity. In this evolutionary world, absolute spontaneity, which always remains in every law, creates new indeterminate parts, which in the evolutionary path, find more regularity and approach the determined state. Therefore, the remaining of this amount of spontaneity and indeterminacy in the world is the basis of the doctrine of Peirce's fallibilism. Peirce says the principle of continuity is the idea of fallibilism objectified. For fallibilism is the doctrine that our knowledge is never absolute but always swims, as it were, in a continuum of uncertainty and of indeterminacy. Now the doctrine of continuity is that all things so swim in continua. Then, the concept of fallibilism in Peirce is explained with details, and the evolutionary nature of fallibility is explained. Then, with pointing to some part of Peirce's epistemology, metaphysics, theology and philosophy of science we try to show that fallibilism is the cornerstone of his philosophy. In the end, it is emphasized that Peirce's theory of truth is also compatible with this doctrine. And since the theory of truth will play a fundamental role in any philosophical system, it is another proof of our claim. Examining the details of this claim requires separate articles.
Keywords

  1. Bartley, W. W. (2018). Rationality versus the Theory of Rationality. In Critical Approaches to Science and Philosophy(pp.3-31). Routledge.
  2. Bernecker, Sven. and Pritchard, Duncan (2011). The Routledge companion to epistemology, First published 2011 by Routledge 270 Madison Avenue, New York, NY 10016.
  3. Burch, Robert (2024). "Charles Sanders Peirce", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy, Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman (eds.).
  4. Burks, Arthur W. (1996). “Peirce’s Evolutionary Pragmatic Idealism”, Synthese 106, no. 3.
  5. Capps, John (2023). "The Pragmatic Theory of Truth", The Stanford Encyclopedia of Philosophy (Summer 2023 Edition), Edward N. Zalta & Uri Nodelman.
  6. Margolis, Joseph (2007). “Rethinking Peirce’s Fallibilism” Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society, vol. 43, no. 2.
  7. Misak, Cheryl (2004). The Cambridge Companion to Peirce, Publisher: Cambridge University Press, Publisher: Cambridge University Press.
  8. Niiniluoto, Ilkka (2018). Truth-Seeking by Abduction, Library of Congress Control Number: 2018953155.
  9. Peirce, C. S. (1958). Collected Papers of Charles Sanders Peirce, 8 vols, edited by Charles Hartshorne, Paul Weiss, and Arthur W. Burks, Harvard University Press, Cambridge, Massachusetts, 1931-1958.
  10. Pence, C. H. (2015). The Many Chances of Charles Darwin, Louisiana State University, 102 Coates Hall, Baton Rouge, LA 70803, USA.
  11. Pihlstrom, Sami (2011). The Continuum Companion to Pragmatism, Edited, publisher: Continuum.
  12. Reynolds, Andrew (2002). Peirce’s Scientific Metaphysics, The Philosophy of Chance, Law, and Evolution, Vanderbilt University Press, All rights reserved First Edition.
  13. Turley, Peter T. (1969). “Peirce on Chance”, Transactions of the Charles S. Peirce Society 5, no. 4. (Fall, 1969), pp.243-254 (12 pages) Published By: Indiana University Press.