1. بهنیافر، مهدی (1384). استنتاج بهترین تبیین در روش اصل‌موضوعی دکارت و پیامدهای معرفت‌شناختی آن. فلسفه علم، 21.
2. نصیری، منصور (1395). استنتاج بهترین تبیین و مسئلۀ توصیف استدلال‌های استقرایی؛ بررسی دیدگاه لیپتون. نقد و نظر، 84.
3. Audi, Robert (1995). Memorial Justification. Philosophical Topics. 23, 31-45.
4. Conee, Earl (2013). Seeming evidence. in Chris Tucker (ed.). Seemings and justification: New essays on dogmatism and phenomenal conservatism, New York: Oxford University Press.
5. Conee, Earl (1988). Seeing the Truth. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 58, 847-857.
6. Conee, Earl and Feldman, Richard (2008). Evidentialism. in Ernest Sosa et al. (eds), Epistemology: An Anthology, Oxford: Blackwell Publishing.
7. Conee, Earl. (2011). Replies. in Trent Dougherty (ed.) Evidentialism and Its Discontents, New York: Oxford University Press.
8. Goldman, Alvin (2011). Toward a Synthesis of Reliabilism and Evidentialism? Or: Evidentialism’s Troubles, Reliabilism’s Rescue Package. in Trent Dougherty (ed.), Evidentialism and Its Discontents, New York: Oxford University Press.
9. Huemer, Michael (2005). Ethical intuitionism. Houndmills. UK: Palgrave Macmillan.
10. Laudan, Larry and Leplin Jarrett. (1991). Empirical Equivalence and Underdetermination. The Journal of Philosophy, 88, 449- 472.
11. Lehrer, Keith (1974). Knowledge. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
12. McCain, Kevin (2014). Evidentialism and Epistemic Justification. New York: Routledge.
13. Pollock, John l. (1974). Knowledge and Justification. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
14. Tollhurst, William (1998). Seemings. American Philosophical Quarterly, 35, pp.293-302.
15. Tucker, Chris (2013). Seemings and justification: An introduction. in Chris Tucker (ed.), Seemings and justification: New essays on dogmatism and phenomenal conservatism, New York: Oxford University Press.

16. Williamson, Timothy (2000). Knowledge and its Limits. Oxford: Oxford University Press.