1. Alston, William (1988). “The Deontological Concepts of Epistemic Justification”, Philosophical Perspectives, Vol. 2, Epistemology, 257-299.
2. Alston, William P (1985). “Concepts of Epistemic Justification”, The Monist, 68)1(, Knowledge, Justification, and Reliability, Part I, 57-89.
3. Booth, Anthony Robert (2014). “On some recent moves in defence of doxastic compatibilism”, Synthese, 191, 1867–1880.
4. Carlos, J. Moya (2006). Moral Responsibility, the Ways of Skepticism, Routledge.
5. Feldman, Richard (1988). “Epistemic Obligations”, in James E. Tomberlin (ed.), Philosophical Perspectives, 2: Epistemology, 235–256.
6. Feldman, Richard (2000). “The Ethics of Belief”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 60)3(, 667–695.
7. Feldman, Richard (2001). “Voluntary Belief and Epistemic Evaluation”, in Matthias Steup (ed.), Knowledge, Truth, and Duty: Essays on Epistemic Justification, Responsibility, and Virtue, Oxford University Press.
8. Foley, Richard (1987). The Theory of Epistemic Rationality, Harvard University Press.
9. Frankfort, Harry (1971). “Freedom of the will and the Concept of a Person”, Journal of Philosophy, 68)1(, 5-20.
10. Frankfurt, Harry G (1969). “Alternate Possibilities and Moral Responsibility”, The Journal of Philosophy, 66(23), 829–839.
11. Heller, Mark (2000). “Hobartian voluntarism: Grounding a deontological conceptionof epistemic justification”, Pacific Philosophical Quarterly, 81 (2), 130–141.
12. Hobart, R. E (1934). “Free Will as Involving Determination and Inconceivable Without It”, Mind, New Series, 43(169), 1-27.
13. Owens, David (2000). Reason without Freedom: The Problem of Epistemic Normativity, Routledge and Kegan Paul.
14. Peels, Rik (2013(. “Belief- Policies Cannot Ground Doxastic Responsibility”, Erkenntnis, 78(3), 561–569.
15. Peels, Rik (2014). “Against Doxastic Compatibilism”, Philosophy and Phenomenological Research. 89(3), 679–702.
16. Peels, Rik (2017). Responsible Belief, A Theory in Ethics and Epistemology, Oxford University Press.
17. Ryan, Sharon (2003). “Doxastic Compatibilism and the Ethics of Belief”, Philosophical Studies: An International Journal for Philosophy in the Analytic Tradition, 114(½), 47-79.
18. Steup, Matthias (2008). “Doxastic Freedom”, Synthese, 161(3), 375–392.
19. Steup, Matthias (2011). “Belief, voluntariness and intentionality”, Dialectica, 65, 559–576.
20. Steup, Matthias (2012). “Belief Control and Intentionality”, Synthese 2, 145–163.
21. Williams, Bernard (1973). Deciding to Believe, Problems of the Self. Cambridge University Press.

Zagzebski L (1996). Virtues of the mind: An inquiry into the nature of virtue and the ethical foundations of knowledge. New York: Cambridge University Press.